Addepto vs Persistent Systems: full comparison for 2026
Last updated: July 2026
Quick verdict
Addepto (4.4/5) edges ahead of Persistent Systems (3.9/5) overall. Addepto is the better choice for cost-conscious teams that specifically need MLOps consulting or a well-scoped machine learning advisory engagement rather than a full custom software build.. Persistent Systems is the stronger option for mid-market and enterprise buyers wanting a publicly traded, multi-cloud certified partner with pre-built MLOps and explainable-AI accelerators.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Addepto vs Persistent Systems: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Addepto | Persistent Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2018 | 1990 |
| HQ | Warsaw, Poland | Pune, India |
| Team size | 51–200 | 10,000+ |
| Rating | 4.4 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Best for | Cost-conscious teams that specifically need MLOps consulting or a well-scoped machine learning advisory engagement rather than a full custom software build. | Mid-market and enterprise buyers wanting a publicly traded, multi-cloud certified partner with pre-built MLOps and explainable-AI accelerators. |
| Pricing model | Project-based | Not published; enterprise project engagements |
| Min. engagement | $10,000 | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Python, MLOps tooling, Cloud ML platforms (AWS/GCP/Azure) | AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud |
| Industries served | Finance, Healthcare, Retail | Healthcare, Financial services, Technology/software, Life sciences |
Addepto vs Persistent Systems: overview
Addepto
Addepto is a Poland-based AI consulting firm founded in 2018 by Artur Haponik and Edwin Lisowski that focuses specifically on machine learning consulting, MLOps consulting, and data/analytics advisory work rather than broader software development. The company has around 52 employees and holds a 4.7 Clutch rating, with Clutch-reported project costs typically in the $10,000–$49,000 range, making it one of the more budget-accessible options among firms in this category. Addepto has been recognized among Forbes' top AI consulting companies and appeared on the Deloitte Technology Fast 500 EMEA list, citing 1,193 percent revenue growth over the qualifying period. In December 2025, Addepto was acquired by KMS Technology, a US-based digital engineering, data, and AI company backed by growth private equity firm Sunstone Partners; Addepto now operates as an integrated division rather than as a fully independent company.
Persistent Systems
Persistent Systems Limited was founded in 1990 in Pune, India, by Dr. Anand Deshpande, and has grown into a publicly traded (NSE/BSE: PERSISTENT) multinational technology services company with more than 24,000 employees. Its Data Science and Machine Learning practice spans data engineering through enterprise ML deployment across AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud, supported by its Data Experience Hub (DxH), a set of accelerators aimed at operationalizing ML and detecting bias in models through explainable AI. Persistent was named a Leader in the Everest Group Data & AI PEAK Matrix 2025 for the mid-market segment, and holds AWS Premier Tier Partner and Google Cloud Data & Analytics plus Machine Learning Specializations.
Services and capabilities: Addepto vs Persistent Systems
| Capability | Addepto | Persistent Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Custom model training | ✓ | ✓ |
| Fine-tuning & adaptation | ✗ | ✗ |
| MLOps pipeline | ✓ | ✓ |
| Model deployment & serving | ✗ | ✗ |
| Data engineering for ML | ✓ | ✓ |
| ML infrastructure management | ✗ | ✓ |
| Computer vision | ✗ | ✗ |
| NLP & LLM development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Forecasting & time-series modeling | ✗ | ✗ |
| ML strategy consulting | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Addepto vs Persistent Systems
| Framework / platform | Addepto | Persistent Systems |
|---|---|---|
| PyTorch | N/A | N/A |
| TensorFlow | N/A | N/A |
| MLflow | N/A | N/A |
| AWS SageMaker | N/A | N/A |
| Amazon Bedrock | N/A | N/A |
| Google Cloud | N/A | ✓ |
| Microsoft Azure | N/A | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
| Snowflake | N/A | N/A |
| NVIDIA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Addepto vs Persistent Systems
| Criterion | Addepto | Persistent Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $10,000 | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Advisory/consulting retainer | Enterprise project engagement, Managed AI services |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Not public |
| Price tier | Accessible | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Addepto vs Persistent Systems
| Dimension | Addepto | Persistent Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Enterprise |
| Best industries | Finance, Healthcare, Retail | Healthcare, Financial services, Technology/software |
| Best use cases | Auditing an existing ML pipeline and recommending MLOps improvements, Running a well-scoped, budget-constrained machine learning pilot | Operationalizing ML models at enterprise scale using pre-built MLOps accelerators, Running bias detection and explainable AI reviews on existing production models |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Enterprise project engagement |
Addepto vs Persistent Systems: pros and cons
| Addepto | |
|---|---|
| + | 4.7 Clutch rating with lower typical project cost ($10K–$49K) than most peers in this comparison. |
| + | Named a top 10 AI consulting company by Forbes. |
| + | Deloitte Technology Fast 500 EMEA recognition (#143) signals strong recent revenue growth. |
| + | Focused specifically on ML/MLOps consulting rather than diluting attention across general software development. |
| - | Small team (~52 employees) caps capacity for large or multiple concurrent enterprise engagements. |
| - | Lower typical project size may signal a fit for smaller-scope work rather than large production ML platforms. |
| - | Public case studies with named enterprise clients are limited in available sources. |
| - | Now part of KMS Technology following the December 2025 acquisition, introducing near-term integration and roadmap uncertainty for prospective clients. |
| Persistent Systems | |
|---|---|
| + | Everest Group Leader ranking in the Data & AI PEAK Matrix 2025 (mid-market segment) is an independently sourced third-party validation. |
| + | Purpose-built DxH accelerators for MLOps and bias detection add concrete, named tooling beyond generic claims. |
| + | Publicly traded with 35-year operating history, providing financial transparency. |
| + | Named healthcare client work (e.g., cancer-detection collaboration) with a specific, checkable use case. |
| - | Very large scale (24,000+ employees) means ML/AI is one of several major practice areas competing for delivery focus. |
| - | No clearly located aggregate Clutch/G2 star rating specific to its AI practice in available public sources. |
| - | Pricing model and minimum engagement are not published. |
| - | India-centric delivery model may require additional coordination for clients preferring more localized teams. |
Who should choose Addepto?
Addepto is the right choice for cost-conscious teams that specifically need MLOps consulting or a well-scoped machine learning advisory engagement rather than a full custom software build..
Dedicated MLOps-consulting service line and Clutch-reported project pricing well below several peers in this list, making it the more budget-accessible option.. Minimum engagement starts at $10,000. Works best with clients in Finance, Healthcare, Retail.
Who should choose Persistent Systems?
Persistent Systems is the right choice for mid-market and enterprise buyers wanting a publicly traded, multi-cloud certified partner with pre-built MLOps and explainable-AI accelerators..
Purpose-built DxH accelerator suite for MLOps and bias detection, plus a specific Everest Group Leader ranking in the mid-market Data & AI segment rather than only the largest enterprise tier.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Financial services, Technology/software, Life sciences.
Decision matrix: Addepto vs Persistent Systems
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Addepto |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Addepto ($10,000) vs Persistent Systems (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Persistent Systems |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Addepto |
Use case fit: Addepto vs Persistent Systems
| Use case | Addepto fit | Persistent Systems fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Auditing an existing ML pipeline and recommending MLOps improvements | Strong | Limited | Addepto |
| Running a well-scoped, budget-constrained machine learning pilot | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Operationalizing ML models at enterprise scale using pre-built MLOps accelerators | Limited | Strong | Persistent Systems |
| Running bias detection and explainable AI reviews on existing production models | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| MLOps pipeline setup | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
Verdict: Addepto vs Persistent Systems
Addepto (4.4/5) is the stronger overall choice for most ML Model Development projects. Dedicated MLOps-consulting service line and Clutch-reported project pricing well below several peers in this list, making it the more budget-accessible option.. It is best for cost-conscious teams that specifically need MLOps consulting or a well-scoped machine learning advisory engagement rather than a full custom software build..
Persistent Systems (3.9/5) is the better choice when mid-market and enterprise buyers wanting a publicly traded, multi-cloud certified partner with pre-built MLOps and explainable-AI accelerators.. If your situation matches those criteria, Persistent Systems is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Addepto vs Persistent Systems FAQ
Is Addepto better than Persistent Systems?
Addepto (4.4/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Addepto is better for cost-conscious teams that specifically need MLOps consulting or a well-scoped machine learning advisory engagement rather than a full custom software build.. Persistent Systems is better for mid-market and enterprise buyers wanting a publicly traded, multi-cloud certified partner with pre-built MLOps and explainable-AI accelerators..
How do Addepto and Persistent Systems differ in pricing?
Addepto uses project-based pricing with a minimum engagement of $10,000. Persistent Systems uses not published; enterprise project engagements pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Addepto or Persistent Systems?
Addepto is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Addepto and Persistent Systems?
Addepto's primary differentiator is: dedicated mlops-consulting service line and clutch-reported project pricing well below several peers in this list, making it the more budget-accessible option.. Persistent Systems's primary differentiator is: purpose-built dxh accelerator suite for mlops and bias detection, plus a specific everest group leader ranking in the mid-market data & ai segment rather than only the largest enterprise tier.. They also differ in team size (51–200 vs 10,000+), minimum engagement ($10,000 vs Not published), and primary industries served (Finance, Healthcare vs Healthcare, Financial services).
Last reviewed: July 2026. Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.