EPAM Systems vs Globant: full comparison for 2026
Last updated: July 2026
Quick verdict
EPAM Systems (3.9/5) edges ahead of Globant (3.9/5) overall. EPAM Systems is the better choice for very large enterprises wanting a publicly traded, AWS Global Partner of the Year-caliber vendor with a proprietary AI orchestration platform.. Globant is the stronger option for large enterprises wanting industry-specific pre-packaged AI solutions ("AI Pods") delivered through a studio-based model rather than fully bespoke consulting.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
EPAM Systems vs Globant: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | EPAM Systems | Globant |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1993 | 2003 |
| HQ | Newtown, USA | Luxembourg City, Luxembourg |
| Team size | 10,000+ | 10,000+ |
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Best for | Very large enterprises wanting a publicly traded, AWS Global Partner of the Year-caliber vendor with a proprietary AI orchestration platform. | Large enterprises wanting industry-specific pre-packaged AI solutions ("AI Pods") delivered through a studio-based model rather than fully bespoke consulting. |
| Pricing model | Not published; enterprise project engagements | Not published; moving toward subscription-style pricing for AI Pods (per third-party commentary; independently unverifiable in detail) |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | AWS SageMaker, Amazon Bedrock, EPAM DIAL (proprietary) | Proprietary Glob.AI OS platform, Computer vision (via Synthesis AI partnership), Cloud ML platforms |
| Industries served | Financial services, Life sciences, Media, Travel and hospitality | Financial services, Life sciences, Airlines/travel, Sports and entertainment |
EPAM Systems vs Globant: overview
EPAM Systems
EPAM Systems was founded in 1993 in Newtown, Pennsylvania by Arkadiy Dobkin and Leo Lozner, and has grown into a publicly traded (NYSE: EPAM) global engineering company with more than 53,000 employees. EPAM's AI/ML practice includes model development and deployment on Amazon SageMaker and Amazon Bedrock, MLOps, and its proprietary DIAL platform, an enterprise AI orchestration layer. The company was named AWS Global Innovation Partner of the Year in 2025 and holds AWS Premier Tier Services Partner status, reflecting deep hyperscaler-certified delivery capability at very large scale.
Globant
Globant was founded in 2003 in Buenos Aires by Martin Migoya, Guibert Englebienne, Martin Umaran, and Nestor Nocetti, and is now headquartered in Luxembourg while trading publicly on the NYSE under GLOB. The company reports roughly 29,000 employees and organizes its AI capability around eight industry-specific studios that produce what it calls "AI Pods," tailored solutions for specific industry challenges spanning financial services, life sciences, and airlines among others. Globant was recognized by IDC MarketScape as a Worldwide Leader in AI Services in 2023, and has named client work including LALIGA for agentic AI in sports, presented at NVIDIA GTC 2026.
Services and capabilities: EPAM Systems vs Globant
| Capability | EPAM Systems | Globant |
|---|---|---|
| Custom model training | ✓ | ✓ |
| Fine-tuning & adaptation | ✗ | ✗ |
| MLOps pipeline | ✓ | ✗ |
| Model deployment & serving | ✓ | ✗ |
| Data engineering for ML | ✗ | ✗ |
| ML infrastructure management | ✓ | ✗ |
| Computer vision | ✗ | ✓ |
| NLP & LLM development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Forecasting & time-series modeling | ✗ | ✗ |
| ML strategy consulting | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: EPAM Systems vs Globant
| Framework / platform | EPAM Systems | Globant |
|---|---|---|
| PyTorch | N/A | N/A |
| TensorFlow | N/A | N/A |
| MLflow | N/A | N/A |
| AWS SageMaker | ✓ | N/A |
| Amazon Bedrock | ✓ | N/A |
| Google Cloud | N/A | N/A |
| Microsoft Azure | N/A | N/A |
| Kubernetes | ✓ | N/A |
| Snowflake | N/A | N/A |
| NVIDIA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: EPAM Systems vs Globant
| Criterion | EPAM Systems | Globant |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Enterprise project engagement, Managed AI services | Studio-based engagement, Enterprise project engagement, Subscription (AI Pods) |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: EPAM Systems vs Globant
| Dimension | EPAM Systems | Globant |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Best industries | Financial services, Life sciences, Media | Financial services, Life sciences, Airlines/travel |
| Best use cases | Very large enterprises needing an AWS Global Partner of the Year-caliber vendor for ML platform work, Deploying models on Amazon SageMaker or Bedrock with EPAM's proprietary DIAL orchestration layer | Large enterprises wanting pre-packaged, industry-specific AI solutions delivered quickly via studio teams, Sports, entertainment, or media companies exploring agentic AI applications |
| Typical project type | Enterprise project engagement | Studio-based engagement |
EPAM Systems vs Globant: pros and cons
| EPAM Systems | |
|---|---|
| + | 2025 AWS Global Innovation Partner of the Year, an independently awarded distinction from AWS itself. |
| + | Proprietary DIAL orchestration platform provides a differentiated technical asset beyond standard consulting delivery. |
| + | Publicly traded (NYSE: EPAM) with substantial financial transparency and scale (53,000+ employees). |
| + | AWS Premier Tier Services Partner status confirms deep, audited hyperscaler certification. |
| - | Very large, generalist software engineering brand means ML/AI is one of many practice areas, not a dedicated specialization. |
| - | No clearly located aggregate Clutch/G2 star rating specific to its AI practice in available public sources. |
| - | Pricing model and minimum engagement are not published, and enterprise minimums are typically substantial. |
| - | Named client-specific ML case studies were not clearly surfaced in available search results. |
| Globant | |
|---|---|
| + | IDC MarketScape Worldwide Leader in AI Services (2023), an independently sourced third-party analyst validation. |
| + | Named, checkable client work (LALIGA agentic AI, presented publicly at NVIDIA GTC 2026). |
| + | Industry-specific studio model can accelerate time-to-value versus fully custom engagements. |
| + | Publicly traded (NYSE: GLOB) with substantial scale (29,000+ employees). |
| - | Studio/Pod delivery model provides less MLOps/infrastructure-specific documented depth than peers like EPAM or Persistent. |
| - | No clearly located aggregate Clutch/G2 star rating in available public sources. |
| - | Pricing details, including the reported move to subscription models, are not fully independently verifiable. |
| - | Large scale means individual client attention may vary depending on which studio is engaged. |
Who should choose EPAM Systems?
EPAM Systems is the right choice for very large enterprises wanting a publicly traded, AWS Global Partner of the Year-caliber vendor with a proprietary AI orchestration platform..
Proprietary EPAM DIAL platform for enterprise AI orchestration, combined with the 2025 AWS Global Innovation Partner of the Year distinction, an award-level differentiator not held by most peers.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Financial services, Life sciences, Media, Travel and hospitality.
Who should choose Globant?
Globant is the right choice for large enterprises wanting industry-specific pre-packaged AI solutions ("AI Pods") delivered through a studio-based model rather than fully bespoke consulting..
Only company in this list organized around a formal "studio + AI Pods" delivery model, and the only one with an IDC MarketScape Worldwide Leader in AI Services designation.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Financial services, Life sciences, Airlines/travel, Sports and entertainment.
Decision matrix: EPAM Systems vs Globant
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: EPAM Systems (Not published) vs Globant (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | EPAM Systems |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Globant |
Use case fit: EPAM Systems vs Globant
| Use case | EPAM Systems fit | Globant fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Very large enterprises needing an AWS Global Partner of the Year-caliber vendor for ML platform work | Strong | Limited | EPAM Systems |
| Deploying models on Amazon SageMaker or Bedrock with EPAM's proprietary DIAL orchestration layer | Strong | Limited | EPAM Systems |
| Large enterprises wanting pre-packaged, industry-specific AI solutions delivered quickly via studio teams | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Sports, entertainment, or media companies exploring agentic AI applications | Limited | Strong | Globant |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| MLOps pipeline setup | Strong | Limited | EPAM Systems |
Verdict: EPAM Systems vs Globant
EPAM Systems (3.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most ML Model Development projects. Proprietary EPAM DIAL platform for enterprise AI orchestration, combined with the 2025 AWS Global Innovation Partner of the Year distinction, an award-level differentiator not held by most peers.. It is best for very large enterprises wanting a publicly traded, AWS Global Partner of the Year-caliber vendor with a proprietary AI orchestration platform..
Globant (3.9/5) is the better choice when large enterprises wanting industry-specific pre-packaged AI solutions ("AI Pods") delivered through a studio-based model rather than fully bespoke consulting.. If your situation matches those criteria, Globant is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
EPAM Systems vs Globant FAQ
Is EPAM Systems better than Globant?
EPAM Systems (3.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. EPAM Systems is better for very large enterprises wanting a publicly traded, AWS Global Partner of the Year-caliber vendor with a proprietary AI orchestration platform.. Globant is better for large enterprises wanting industry-specific pre-packaged AI solutions ("AI Pods") delivered through a studio-based model rather than fully bespoke consulting..
How do EPAM Systems and Globant differ in pricing?
EPAM Systems uses not published; enterprise project engagements pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Globant uses not published; moving toward subscription-style pricing for ai pods (per third-party commentary; independently unverifiable in detail) pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: EPAM Systems or Globant?
EPAM Systems is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between EPAM Systems and Globant?
EPAM Systems's primary differentiator is: proprietary epam dial platform for enterprise ai orchestration, combined with the 2025 aws global innovation partner of the year distinction, an award-level differentiator not held by most peers.. Globant's primary differentiator is: only company in this list organized around a formal "studio + ai pods" delivery model, and the only one with an idc marketscape worldwide leader in ai services designation.. They also differ in team size (10,000+ vs 10,000+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial services, Life sciences vs Financial services, Life sciences).
Last reviewed: July 2026. Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.